[Gpe-list] Where should I file bugs related to using multisync and gpe-sync plugin?

[h.m.]

Hello,

I have reported the need of sync multiple calendars to
http://bugs.linuxtogo.org/ (ID 85). 

As Graham mentioned, one possible way is to enhance the configuration of
opensync (or enhance the abilities of gpesyncd?) to access the
gpe-calendars separately for the sync-process. 

I think, that this approach solves your problem too.

Greetings,
Helge


Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 09:42 +0200 schrieb Lars Persson Fink:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to continue the discussion on multiple calendars during sync,
> now that categories are synced properly.
> 
> I have the following scenario:
> 
> My Evolution has two calendars, one personal, and one public that is
> published on icalx.com.
> 
> My N800 also has two calendars, one personal and one that it subscribes
> to, which is the one Evolution published on icalx.com.
> 
> When I sync my N800 will send all new events including events from the
> subscribed calendar into my personal calendar in Evolution. This means
> that my Evolution personal calendar will end up with all events from
> both calendars, which is not what I want. 
> 
> I would like to have the same possibility for GPE, as for Evolution, to
> choose which calendar to sync in Multisync to create a one-to-one
> mapping between calendars.
> 
> Best regards,
> Lars Persson Fink.
> 
> tor 2007-09-06 klockan 17:35 +0100 skrev Graham Cobb:
> > On Thursday 06 September 2007 14:39, h.m. wrote:
> > > I am new here. Where and how should this "bug" reported?
> > >
> > > Another issue: GPE and evolution can handle multiple calenders ( great
> > > feature ), but not the sync-process. I do not see why.
> > 
> > Please report both these in the GPE bugzilla (http://bugs.linuxtogo.org/).
> > 
> > I am not quite sure how to handle multiple calendars during sync.  I am 
> > thinking that the user could configure the calendar to use for a particular 
> > sync group in Opensync and the sync would proceed with only this calendar 
> > visible (i.e. entries would only be read from this calendar and new entries 
> > would be created in this calendar).  This could be made more complex: 
> > allowing multiple calendars to be specified for reading although just one 
> > would have to be specified for creating new entries.
> > 
> > An alternative would be to somehow sync the calendar name as well (so events 
> > in an Evo calendar called "work" would appear in a GPE calendar also 
> > called "work").  This would probably be harder (as the calendar names are not 
> > currently exchanged in Opensync) and it is not clear this is really what the 
> > user would want.  This could always be simulated in the first approach by 
> > doing separate syncs for the two calendars.
> > 
> > You obviously expected multiple calendars to work -- what behaviour were you 
> > expecting?
> > 
> > Graham
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gpe-list mailing list
> > Gpe-list at linuxtogo.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpe-list